[Advances in the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus]. / è·éª¨éª¨è½¯éª¨æŸä¼¤æ²»ç–—çš„ç ”ç©¶è¿›å±•.

Osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) is a localized cartilage and subchondral bone injury of the talus trochlea. OLT is caused by trauma and other reasons, including osteochondritis dissecans of the talus (OCD) and talus osteochondral tangential fracture. OLT can develop from being asymptomatic to subchondral bone cysts accompanied by deep ankle pain. OLT tends to occur on the medial and lateral sides of the talar vault. OLT seriously affects the patients' life and work and may even lead to disability. Herein, we reviewed advances in the treatment of OLT and the strengths and weaknesses of various treatments. Different treatment methods, including conservative treatments and surgical treatments, can be adopted according to the different subtypes or clinical symptoms of OLT. Conservative treatments mostly relieve symptoms in the short term and only slow down the disease. In recent years, it has been discovered that platelet-rich plasma injection, microfracture, periosteal bone grafting, talar cartilage transplantation, allograft bone transplantation, reverse drilling under robotic navigation, and other methods can achieve considerable benefits when each of these treatment methods is applied. Furthermore, microfracture combined with platelet-rich plasma injections, microfracture combined with cartilage transplantation, and various other treatment methods combined with anterior talofibular ligament repair have all led to good treatment outcomes.

Comparison of Arthroscopic Microfracture for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus With and Without Small and Shallow Subchondral Cysts.

BACKGROUND: Whether arthroscopic microfracture is effective in treating cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) remains controversial. In this study, outcome parameters in patients with small and shallow subchondral cysts are compared to patients without cysts with the hypothesis that equivalent outcomes may be found after primary microfracture treatment. METHODS: From 2018 to 2021, all 50 OLTs treated with arthroscopic microfracture in the authors' hospital were retrospectively reviewed for eligibility. Single unilateral symptomatic lesions were included and divided into the cyst and noncyst groups, whereas kissing lesions and arthritic lesions were excluded. Numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores, Tegner activity level scores, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging results were used to describe outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were included, 16 in the cyst group and 19 in the noncyst group. The patient characteristics were similar between the 2 groups (P > .05). In the cyst group the average cysts depth was 5.0 ± 1.3 mm. After a mean follow-up duration of 36.2 ± 10.2 months, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups in NRS, AOFAS, FAAM, or Tegner score improvement (P > .05). Three patients (19%) in the cyst group had no NRS score improvement. CONCLUSION: OLTs with small and shallow subchondral cysts can be treated with arthroscopic microfracture and achieve similar outcomes as noncystic lesions. A few cystic lesions may not respond to microfracture treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

10-Year Prospective Clinical and Radiological Evaluation After Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation and Comparison of Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Graft Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes in larger cohorts after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) are required. Furthermore, little is known about the longer-term clinical and radiological outcomes of MACI performed in the tibiofemoral versus patellofemoral knee joint. PURPOSE: To present the 10-year clinical and radiological outcomes in patients after MACI and compare outcomes in patients undergoing tibiofemoral versus patellofemoral MACI. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Between September 2002 and December 2012, 204 patients who underwent MACI were prospectively registered into a research program and assessed preoperatively and at 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. Of these patients, 168 were available for clinical review at 10 years, with 151 (of a total of 182) grafts also assessed via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients were evaluated using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, a visual analog scale for pain frequency and severity, satisfaction, and peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength. Limb symmetry indices (LSIs) were calculated for strength measures. Grafts were scored on MRI scans via the MOCART (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue) system, with a focus on tissue infill and an overall MRI graft composite score. RESULTS: All patient-reported outcome measures improved (P < .0001) up to 2 years after surgery. Apart from the significant increase (P = .004) in the peak isokinetic knee extensor LSI, no other patient-reported outcome measure or clinical score had changed significantly from 2 to 10 years. At the final follow-up, 92% of patients were satisfied with MACI to provide knee pain relief, with 76% satisfied with their ability to participate in sports. From 2 to 10 years, no significant change was seen for any MRI-based MOCART variable nor the overall MRI composite score. Of the 151 grafts reviewed via MRI at 10 years, 14 (9.3%) had failed, defined by graft delamination or no graft tissue on MRI scan. Furthermore, of the 36 patients (of the prospectively recruited 204) who were not available for longer-term review, 7 had already proceeded to total knee arthroplasty, and 1 patient had undergone secondary MACI at the same medial femoral condylar site because of an earlier graft failure. Therefore, 22 patients (10.8%) essentially had graft failure over the period. At the final follow-up, patients who underwent MACI in the tibiofemoral (vs patellofemoral) joint reported significantly better Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscale scores for Quality of Life (P = .010) and Sport and Recreation (P < .001), as well as a greater knee extensor strength LSI (P = .002). Even though the tibiofemoral group demonstrated better 10-year MOCART scores for tissue infill (P = .027), there were no other MRI-based differences (P > .05). CONCLUSION: This study reports the long-term review of a prospective series of patients undergoing MACI, demonstrating good clinical scores, high levels of patient satisfaction, and acceptable graft survivorship at 10 years. Patients undergoing tibiofemoral (vs patellofemoral) MACI reported better long-term clinical outcomes, despite largely similar MRI-based outcomes.

Arthroscopic microfracture and associated techniques in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: A systematic review and metanalysis.

BACKGROUND: Osteochondral lesions of the talus are common in patients suffering even minor trauma; timely diagnosis and treatment can prevent the development of early osteoarthritis. The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to evaluate the effects of additional procedures on arthroscopic ankle microperforations for osteochondral lesions. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed-Medline, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar to select clinical studies analyzing the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyaluronic acid (HA), and bone marrow concentrate (BMC) procedures. Ten articles following PRISMA guidelines with a total of 464 patients were included in this review. Quality assessment using MINORS was performed, and all studies demonstrated high quality. RESULTS: The results of the systematic review showed benefits in all patients undergoing infiltrative therapy with PRP, hyaluronic acid, and BMC. The best results in terms of AOFAS score and VAS scale were found in patients undergoing PRP injection. The meta-analysis showed improvements in pain relief and return to daily activities in patients undergoing arthroscopic microperforations and PRP, although not reporting statistically significant results (p = 0.42). CONCLUSION: All treatment strategies reported better scores compared to the control groups. Among the various treatments analyzed, the addition of PRP appears to be the most valuable probably for the larger population receiving this treatment, showing excellent outcomes in pain reduction, clinical outcomes, and return to daily activities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Costal Chondrocyte-Derived Pellet-Type Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects: A 5-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Costal chondrocyte-derived pellet-type autologous chondrocyte implantation (CCP-ACI) has been introduced as a new therapeutic option for the treatment of articular cartilage defects. We had previously conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing CCP-ACI versus microfracture at 1 year postoperatively. PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of CCP-ACI versus microfracture for the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee at 5 years postoperatively. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: This study describes the mean 5-year follow-up of a previously published prospective clinical trial. The previous prospective trial compared the results of CCP-ACI versus microfracture until 1 year of follow-up. Of the 30 patients who were included in the previous study, 25 were followed up for 5 years. Patients were evaluated based on clinical outcome scores (Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], and visual analog scale for pain), magnetic resonance imaging findings, and rates of treatment failure at last follow-up. RESULTS: The MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) score in the CCP-ACI group was significantly higher than that in the microfracture group at 5 years (62.3 vs 26.7, respectively; P < .0001). The Lysholm score and KOOS score in the CCP-ACI group were significantly higher than those in the microfracture group at 5 years (84.5 vs 64.9, respectively, and 390.9 vs 303.0, respectively; P = .023 and P = .017, respectively). There was 1 case of treatment failure that occurred in the microfracture group. CONCLUSION: The present randomized controlled trial indicated that the results of both procedures clinically and statistically significantly improved at 1 and 5 years' follow-up in treating cartilage defects, but the results of CCP-ACI were superior to those of microfracture. Magnetic resonance imaging conducted at 1 year and 5 years after CCP-ACI revealed statistically significant superior structural integration with native cartilage tissue compared with microfracture. REGISTRATION: NCT03545269 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Autologous Costal Chondral/Osteochondral Transplantation and Costa-Derived Chondrocyte Implantation for Articular Cartilage Repair: Basic Science and Clinical Applications.

There has been increasing application of autologous costal chondral/osteochondral transplantation (ACCT/ACOT) and costa-derived chondrocyte implantation (ACCI) for articular cartilage repair over the past three decades. This review presents the major evidence on the properties of costal cartilage and bone and their qualifications as grafts for articular cartilage repair, the major clinical applications, and the risks and strategies for costal chondral/osteochondral graft(s) harvest. First, costal cartilage has many specific properties that help restore the articular surface. Costa, which can provide abundant cartilage and cylindrical corticocancellous bone, preserves permanent chondrocyte and is the largest source of hyaline cartilage. Second, in the past three decades, autologous costal cartilage-derived grafts, including cartilage, osteochondral graft(s), and chondrocyte, have expanded their indications in trauma and orthopaedic therapy from small to large joints, from the upper to lower limbs, and from non-weight-bearing to weight-bearing joints. Third, the rate of donor-site complications of ACCT or ACOT is low, acceptable, and controllable, and some skills and accumulated experience can help reduce the risks of ACCT and ACOT. Costal cartilage-derived autografting is a promising technique and could be an ideal option for articular chondral lesions with or without subchondral cysts. More high-quality clinical studies are urgently needed to help us further understand the clinical value of such technologies.

Articular Cartilage Injury; Current Status and Future Direction.

Today, treatments of cartilage and osteochondral lesions are routine clinical procedures. The avascular and hard-to-self-repair nature of cartilage tissue has posed a clinical challenge for the replacement and reconstruction of damaged cartilage. Treatment of large articular cartilage defects is technically difficult and complex, often accompanied by failure. Articular cartilage cannot repair itself after injury due to a lack of blood vessels, lymph, and nerves. Various treatments for cartilage regeneration have shown encouraging results, but unfortunately, none have been the perfect solution. New minimally invasive and effective techniques are being developed. The development of tissue engineering technology has created hope for articular cartilage reconstruction. This technology mainly supplies stem cells with various sources of pluripotent and mesenchymal stem cells. This article describes the treatments in detail, including types, grades of cartilage lesions, and immune mechanisms in cartilage injuries.

Does AMIC® provide improvements at least two years after surgery for knee osteochondral lesions? A multicentre retrospective study of 101 patients.

BACKGROUND: Osteochondral defects of the knee due to trauma or osteochondritis are associated with osteoarthritis in the medium term. Defects 2 to 8cm2 in size can be managed by autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC®), in which sub-chondral micro-fractures are created within the lesion and the defect is then covered by a matrix of type I and type III collagen to induce de novo cartilage formation. Although promising outcomes have been observed in small single-centre cohorts, the medium-term clinical and radiological effectiveness of AMIC® remains to be demonstrated in larger populations. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients at least 2 years after AMIC® for knee osteochondral defects. HYPOTHESIS: AMIC® is associated with clinical and radiological improvements after at least 2 years. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This multicentre (16 centres), multisurgeon (18 senior orthopaedic surgeons), retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent AMIC® with Chondro-Gide® membrane implantation between September 2011 and January 2020. The 36-item Short Form quality-of-life (SF-36) score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score were determined before the procedure and during follow-up. The Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging 2 years after the procedure. RESULTS: In total, 101 patients aged 12 to 60 years were included. Mean follow-up was 30 months. Mean defect size was 3.44cm2 (range, 2-8cm2). Significant improvements were documented in the SF-36 score, KOOS, and IKDC score. The mean MOCART score at 2 years was 75% (range, 20-100). DISCUSSION: The AMIC® procedure was associated with significant improvements at 2.5 years in patients treated for knee osteochondral defects measuring 2 to 8cm2. This method seems to provide similar outcomes to those of other available methods with the advantages of single-step surgery and elimination of osteochondral graft donor-site complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective observational cohort study.

Long-Term Patient Outcomes for Treatment of Difficult Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus with Particulated Juvenile Allograft Cartilage Implantation ± Calcaneal Autograft: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OCLT) are common injuries that can be difficult to treat. To date, long-term patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of patients with particulated juvenile allograft cartilage implantation with or without calcaneal autograft have not been compared. METHODS: Thirteen patients with difficult to treat OCLTs underwent arthroscopic-assisted implantation of particulated juvenile allograft cartilage (DeNovo NT®) with or without autogenous calcaneal bone grafting by a single surgeon. Calcaneal bone graft use was determined by lesion size > 150 mm2 and/or deeper than 5 mm. Patients were evaluated using physical examination, patient interviews, and PROMs. RESULTS: When comparing patients in regards to calcaneal bone graft implantation, no difference in age, BMI, pre-operative PROMs, or follow-up was noted, however, calcaneal bone graft patients did have a significantly larger lesion size (188.5 ± 50.9 vs. 118.7 ± 29.4 mm2 respectively; p value = 0.027). VAS and FAAM ADL scores during final follow-up improvement did not significantly differ between cohorts. The FAAM Sports score improved significantly more for the DeNovo alone group compared to the bone graft cohort (p value = 0.032). The AOFAS score improvement did not differ between cohorts (p value = 0.944), however, the SF-36 PCS improved significantly more for the DeNovo alone group compared to the bone graft cohort (p value = 0.038). No intraoperative/perioperative complications were observed with calcaneal bone grafting. CONCLUSION: While patients followed over the course of ~ 8 years after implantation of particulated juvenile allograft cartilage (DeNovo NT®) with/without autogenous calcaneal bone graft had positive post-operative PROMs, patients without calcaneal bone graft had significantly greater improvement in functional outcome scores. Whether these differences are due to graft incorporation or larger lesion size is unclear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.

Surgical Treatment of Focal Chondral Lesions of the Knee in the Military Population: Current and Future Therapies.

INTRODUCTION: Chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee are common injuries in the military population that have a significant impact on readiness. Definitive treatment of these injuries is challenging since cartilage has a limited capacity for self-repair and regeneration. Management is particularly challenging in military patients who maintain a higher level of activity similar to athletes. Existing surgical techniques have variable results and often long recovery times, sparking the development of several new innovative technologies to return service members back to duty more quickly and effectively after cartilage injury. The purpose of this article is to review the current and future surgical treatments for chondral and osteochondral knee lesions and their relevance in managing these injuries in the military. METHODS: In this review article, we describe the current treatments for chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee, reporting on outcomes in military populations. We explore emerging treatment modalities for cartilage defects, reporting innovations, stage of research, and current data. Published results of each treatment option in military populations are reviewed throughout the article. RESULTS: This review includes 12 treatments for chondral lesions. Of these therapies, four are considered synthetic and the remaining are considered regenerative solutions. Regenerative therapies tend to perform better in younger, healthier populations with robust healing capacity. Success of treatment depends on lesions and patient characteristics. Nearly all modalities currently available in the USA were successful in improving patients from presurgical function in the short (<6 months) term, but the long-term efficacy is still challenged. Upcoming technologies show promising results in clinical and animal studies that may provide alternative options desirable for the military population. CONCLUSIONS: The current treatment options for cartilage lesions are not entirely satisfactory, usually with long recovery times and mixed results. An ideal therapy would be a single procedure that possesses the ability to enable a quick return to activity and duty, alleviate pain, provide long-term durability, and disrupt the progression of osteoarthritis. Evolving technologies for cartilage lesions are expanding beyond currently available techniques that may revolutionize the future of cartilage repair.

Atelocollagen-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation for the repair of large cartilage defects of the knee: Results at three to seven years.

BACKGROUND: Recently, various types of engineered autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) have been developed. Atelocollagen-associated ACI (A-ACI) is the only ACI procedure covered by Japanese Health Insurance since 2013. The indications of the A-ACI are traumatic cartilage defects and osteochondral dissecans (OCD) for knee joints. PURPOSE: To evaluate midterm clinical results after A-ACI for the treatment for full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee. METHODS: Thirteen consecutive patients who underwent A-ACI between 2014 and 2018 had been prospectively enrolled in this study. There were 11 men and 2 women with a mean age of 34 years at the time of surgery. The causes of the cartilage defect were trauma in 10 knees and OCD in 3 knees. The total number of lesions was 15, which were comprised of the medial femoral condyle in 5 knees, the lateral femoral condyle in 5 knees, and the femoral trochlea in 5 knees. The mean size of the lesion was 5.3 cm2. Each knee was clinically and radiologically evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean Lysholm score improved significantly from 74.0 points to 94.0 points (p = 0.008) and each subscale in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score improved significantly (p < 0.001) at the mean final follow-up period of 51 months (range, 36-84 months). The magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue 2.0 score at the mean follow-up of 38 months was significantly higher than that at 2 months postoperatively (p = 0.014). According to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grading scale, 3 knees were graded as normal, 3 knees as nearly normal, and 1 knee as severely abnormal in second-look arthroscopic evaluation at a mean of 22 months (range, 8-41 months) after A-ACI. CONCLUSION: The present study showed a significant subjective and objective clinical improvement in the A-ACI for large cartilage defects of the knee at a mean follow-up of 51 months (range, 36-84 months).

Talonavicular Osteochondral Lesions: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes from the Boston and Amsterdam Perspectives.

PURPOSE: The primary purpose of the present study was to assess the patient-reported outcomes, complications, and reoperation rate of patient who underwent surgical treatment for symptomatic osteochondral lesions of the talonavicular joint (TNJ). METHODS: Patients undergoing surgical treatment for symptomatic osteochondral lesions of the TNJ with a minimum of 12-month follow-up were included. Outcomes included clinical patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to sports and work outcomes, and postoperative complications or reoperations. Medical records were screened by 2 independent reviewers. Patients were contacted by phone and underwent an in-depth interview. Additionally, operative techniques for both arthroscopic and open surgical approaches for treating TNJ osteochondral lesions were described. DESIGN: Retrospective Case Series (Level IV) and Surgical Technique. RESULTS: A total of 7 patients were included with a final follow-up time of 25.4 (SD: 15.2) months follow-up. PROMs were considered satisfactory for 5 out of 7 patients, 6 out of 7 patients returned to any level of sports at a mean of 3.7 (SD: 4.2) months, and 5 out of 6 patients returned to preinjury level of sports at a mean of 14 (SD: 7.5) months. All patients returned to work at an average of 5.4 (SD: 3.6) weeks. No complications or reoperations after index surgery were reported. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of TNJ osteochondral lesions is a feasible procedure that may offer successful clinical, sport, and work outcomes in the majority of patients. Both open and arthroscopic surgical treatments are available and can be considered in a patient-specific treatment plan.

Management of chondral and osteochondral lesions of the hip : A comprehensive review.

Chondral and osteochondral lesions encompass several acute or chronic defects of the articular cartilage and/or subchondral bone. These lesions can result from several different diseases and injuries, including osteochondritis dissecans, osteochondral defects, osteochondral fractures, subchondral bone osteonecrosis, and insufficiency fractures. As the cartilage has a low capacity for regeneration and self-repair, these lesions can progress to osteoarthritis. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the subject matter that it covers. PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar were accessed using the following keywords: "chondral lesions/defects of the femoral head", "chondral/cartilage lesions/defects of the acetabulum", "chondral/cartilage lesions/defects of the hip", "osteochondral lesions of the femoral head", "osteochondral lesions of the acetabulum", "osteochondral lesions of the hip", "osteochondritis dissecans," "early osteoarthritis of the hip," and "early stage avascular necrosis". Hip osteochondral injuries can cause significant damage to the articular surface and diminish the quality of life. It can be difficult to treat such injuries, especially in patients who are young and active. Several methods are used to treat chondral and osteochondral injuries of the hip, such as mesenchymal stem cells and cell-based treatment, surgical repair, and microfractures. Realignment of bony anatomy may also be necessary for optimal outcomes. Despite several treatments being successful, there is a lack of head-to-head comparisons and large sample size studies in the current literature. Additional research will be required to provide appropriate clinical recommendations for treating chondral/osteochondral injuries of the hip joint.

Osteochondral Regeneration in the Knee Joint with Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cells plus Hyaluronic Acid after Arthroscopic Subchondral Drilling: Report of Five Cases.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of osteochondral defects (OCDs) of the knee joint remains challenging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of osteochondral regeneration following intra-articular injections of autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) plus hyaluronic acid (HA) after arthroscopic subchondral drilling into OCDs of the knee joint. CASE PRESENTATION: Five patients with OCDs of the knee joint are presented. The etiology includes osteochondritis dissecans, traumatic knee injuries, previously failed cartilage repair procedures involving microfractures and OATS (osteochondral allograft transfer systems). PBSC were harvested 1 week after surgery. Patients received intra-articular injections at week 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 after surgery. Then at 6 months after surgery, intra-articular injections were administered at a weekly interval for 3 consecutive weeks. These 3 weekly injections were repeated at 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery. Each patient received a total of 17 injections. Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores and MRI scans were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively at serial visits. At follow-ups of >5 years, the mean preoperative and postoperative IKDC scores were 47.2 and 80.7 respectively (p = 0.005). IKDC scores for all patients exceeded the minimal clinically important difference values of 8.3, indicating clinical significance. Serial MRI scans charted the repair and regeneration of the OCDs with evidence of bone growth filling-in the base of the defects, followed by reformation of the subchondral bone plate and regeneration of the overlying articular cartilage. CONCLUSION: These case studies showed that this treatment is able to repair and regenerate both the osseous and articular cartilage components of knee OCDs.

Repair of Rabbit Knee Cartilage by Bipolar Radiofrequency with Different Energy Settings and Recovery Periods.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic bipolar radiofrequency energy (bRFE) is a common method for minimally invasive treatment of cartilage injuries. The benefits of bRFE are still controversial, and its safety has become the focus of attention. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to reveal the effects of energy setting and recovery period on the efficacy and safety of bRFE. METHODS: The New Zealand white rabbit knee cartilage injury model was established, and bRFE was used to treat the cartilage with different energy settings, including 20 W and 40 W, and recovery periods of 0 and 1 month. By observing the immediate and late results on damaged cartilage, along with chondrocyte apoptosis, the effects of energy setting and recovery period on the efficacy and safety of bRFE were accessed. RESULTS: The pathological conditions, surface profile and chondrocyte viability in the bRFE treatment group produced greater late effects and were significantly better than those in the model group. Nevertheless, bRFE produced a timely injury that resulted in an increased rate of apoptosis (p < 0.05), which was alleviated in subsequent recovery (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: bRFE can effectively trim and improve the cartilage lesion area, and reduce cracks. Although bRFE produced timely chondrocyte damage, this was alleviated on subsequent recovery. Therefore, bRFE with appropriate energy is beneficial to the recovery of cartilage damage, proper attention should be paid to the recovery period.

Review of Surgical Management Techniques for Osteochondral Lesions.

Early attempts at surgical management of cartilage lesions date back to the 1950s. Since then, various reconstructive techniques have been developed; unfortunately, none of the methods used has been able to produce a regenerate formed solely of hyaline cartilage. This paper summarizes the most popular techniques for chondral and osteochondral reconstructions of knee joint tissues.The techniques differ in their indications, which depend primarily on the location of the injury, the extent of the damage and the patient's overall health. In cases of deep damage, osteochondral reconstruction is indicated, which involves both repairing the bone defect and creating favorable conditions for the formation of regenerative tissue cartilage.The use of an appropriate repair technique increases the chances of a good therapeutic effect, which is understood as a reduction in pain, resumption of previous activities and slowing down the progression of osteoarthritis.

Increased risk of reoperation and failure to attain clinically relevant improvement following autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee in female patients and individuals with previous surgeries: a time-to-event analysis based on the German cartilage registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU).

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the risk of reoperation following autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) of the knee utilizing third-generation ACI products in a time-to-event analysis and report on the associated patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) in case of reoperation. METHODS: Patients undergoing ACI were included from a longitudinal database. Patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), number of previous surgeries, lesion localization, lesion size, symptom duration, as well as time and type of reoperation was extracted. A cox proportional-hazards model was applied to investigate the influence of baseline variables on risk of reoperation. Reoperation was defined as any type of subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery, excluding hardware removal. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was utilized to compare PROM between patients with and without reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 2039 patients were included with 1359 (66.7%) having a minimum follow-up of 24 months. There were overall 243 reoperations (prevalence 17.9%). Minor arthroscopic procedures (n = 96, 39.5%) and revision cartilage repair procedures (n = 78, 32.1%) were the most common reoperations. Nineteen patients (0.9%) reported conversion arthroplasty at 17.7 (10.4) months after ACI. Female sex (HR 1.5, 95% CI [1.2, 2.0], p = 0.002) and the presence of 1-2 previous surgeries (HR 1.5, 95% CI [1.1, 2.0], p = 0.010), or more than 2 previous surgeries (HR 1.9, 95% CI [1.2, 2.9], p = 0.004) were significantly associated with increased risk of reoperation following ACI. Significantly less patients surpassed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the reoperation group at 24 months regarding the KOOS subscores pain (OR 1.6, 95% CI [1.1, 2.2]), quality of life (OR 2.2, 95% CI [1.6, 3.2]), symptoms (OR 2.0 [1.4, 2.9]), and sports (OR 2.0 [1.4, 2.8]). CONCLUSION: Female patients and individuals with a history of previous surgeries face an elevated risk of requiring reoperation after undergoing ACI, which is associated with failure to attain clinically relevant improvements. A thorough evaluation of the indications for ACI is paramount, particularly when patients have a history of previous surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Satisfactory patient-reported outcomes in patients treated with impaction bone grafting and autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for osteochondral knee defects.

PURPOSE: Osteochondral knee defects usually affect young, active patients and may alter knee biomechanics and progressively lead to joint degeneration. Various treatment options exist with autologous, impaction bone grafting in combination with autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (BG-AMIC) being a less-expensive, one-step, promising option. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological mid-term outcomes of large osteochondral lesions treated with BG-AMIC, identify a possible correlation between the two and report postoperative complications and reoperation rate. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 25 patients treated with the BG-AMIC technique for knee osteochondral lesions was performed. Patients were assessed using the following PROMs: the IKDC, the KOOS and the Lysholm score, the Tegner activity scale and a patient acceptable symptom state (PASS). The EQ-5D-5L score was used to assess health-related quality of life. Radiological assessment was performed using the MOCART 2.0 score on a 3 T MRI. RESULTS: At a mean of 3.8 (± 0.8)-year follow-up, all functional scores increased significantly (p < 0.005) when compared to the preoperative baseline. IKDC increased from 44.5 (± 15.9) to 81.4 (± 14.7), KOOS from 41.5 (± 16.1) to 91.6 (± 11.6) and Lysholm from 54.4 (± 23) to 95.2 (± 5.5) (p < 0.005). The EQ-5D-5L score also revealed a significant improvement [59.9 (± 25) to 93.4 (± 10.2), p < 0.005]. Mean Tegner score reached pre-injury levels. The PASS was positive in 100% of patients. The minimum clinically important difference was reached in all PROMs except for the KOOS Sports subscale. There were no re-operations. Morphological evaluation of the repair tissue using the MOCART 2.0 score revealed a mean total score of 52.8 (± 30.5). A statistically significant, positive correlation was found between the MOCART 2.0 score and the IKDC score, the KOOS ADL subscale and the EQ-5D-5L (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: BG-AMIC is a safe and reliable option for treating deep, knee osteochondral lesions, providing a statistically significant and clinically important improvement in patient-reported outcomes. No complications were noticed, and no re-operations were performed after the procedure. A moderate positive correlation between the MOCART 2.0 score and the IKDC, KOOS ADL and EQ-5D-5L was noticed. However, this correlation is not necessarily clinically relevant, and excellent clinical results can be expected even in patients with low MOCART scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Novel Osteochondral Biotemplate Improves Long-term Cartilage Repair Compared With Microfracture in an Ovine Model.

BACKGROUND: Current cartilage repair therapies do not re-create the complex mechanical interface between cartilage and bone, which is critical for long-term repair durability. New biomaterial designs that include hard tissue-soft tissue interface structures offer promise to improve clinical outcomes. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a naturally derived osteochondral biotemplate with a novel contiguous hard tissue-soft tissue interface in an ovine model as a regenerative solution for articular cartilage defects. It was hypothesized that the osteochondral biotemplate would produce structurally superior repair tissue compared with microfracture over a 13-month period. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Osteochondral biotemplates were manufactured from porcine cancellous bone. Skeletally mature sheep (N = 30) were randomly allocated to 3 groups: early healing stage (euthanasia at 4 months), 6-month treatment, and 13-month treatment. In the early healing stage group, an 8 mm-diameter by 5 mm-deep osteochondral defect was created on the medial femoral condyle and treated at the time of iatrogenic injury with an osteochondral biotemplate. The contralateral limb received the same treatment 2 months later. In the 6- and 13-month treatment groups, 1 limb received the same osteochondral procedure as the early healing stage group. In the contralateral limb, an 8 mm-diameter, full-thickness cartilage defect (1-2 mm deep) was created and treated with microfracture. Cartilage repair and integration were quantitatively and qualitatively assessed with gross inspection, histological evaluation, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Wilcoxon signed-rank and McNemar tests were used to compare the treatments. RESULTS: At 6 and 13 months after treatment, the biotemplate was not present histologically. At 13 months, the biotemplate treatment demonstrated statistically higher histological scores than microfracture for integration with surrounding cartilage (biotemplate: 74 ± 31; microfracture: 28 ± 39; P = .03), type 2 collagen (biotemplate: 72 ± 33; microfracture: 40 ± 38; P = .02), total cartilage (biotemplate: 71 ± 9; microfracture: 59 ± 9; P = .01), and total integration (biotemplate: 85 ± 15; microfracture: 66 ± 20; P = .04). The osteochondral biotemplate treatment produced a notable transient nonneutrophilic inflammatory response that appeared to approach resolution at 13 months. MRI results were not statistically different between the 2 treatments. CONCLUSION: Even with the inflammatory response, after 13 months, the osteochondral biotemplate outperformed microfracture in cartilage regeneration and demonstrated superiority in integration between the repair tissue and host tissue as well as integration between the newly formed cartilage and the underlying bone. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This work has demonstrated the clinical potential of a novel biomaterial template to regenerate the complex mechanical interface between cartilage and the subchondral bone.

Treatment of Chondral Lesions in the Knee / Tratamento das lesões condrais no joelho

Abstract Articular cartilage injuries are common and lead to early joint deterioration and osteoarthritis. Articular cartilage repair techniques aim at forming a cartilaginous neo-tissue to support the articular load and prevent progressive degeneration. Several techniques are available for this purpose, such as microfracture and chondrocyte transplantation. However, the procedural outcome is often fibrocartilage, which does not have the same mechanical resistance as cartilaginous tissue. Procedures with autologous osteochondral graft have a morbidity risk, and tissue availability limits their use. As such, larger lesions undergo osteochondral transplantation using fresh or frozen grafts. New techniques using minced or particulate cartilage fragments or mesenchymal stem cells are promising. This paper aims to update the procedures for treating chondral lesions of the knee.

Resumo As lesões da cartilagem articular são comuns e levam à deterioração precoce da articulação e ao desenvolvimento da osteoartrite. As técnicas de reparo da cartilagem articular visam a formação de um neo-tecido cartilaginoso capaz de suportar carga articular e evitar a progressão da degeneração. Há várias técnicas disponíveis para esse fim, como a microfratura e o transplante de condrócitos. Entretanto muitas vezes o desfecho do procedimento é a formação de fibrocartilagem, que não possui a mesma resistência mecânica do tecido cartilaginoso. Em outros procedimentos, nos quais é realizado enxerto osteocondral autólogo, há risco de morbidade associada ao procedimento, além da disponibilidade limitada de tecido. Por esse motivo, o transplante osteocondral, utilizando enxertos a fresco ou congelados tem sido utilizado para lesões de maior volume. Por fim, novas técnicas utilizando fragmentos de cartilagem picada ou particulada, assim como o uso de células tronco mesenquimais se apresentam como promissores. O objetivo desse artigo é realizar uma atualização dos procedimentos para tratamento das lesões condrais do joelho.